Name: The Structure of Being in Aristotle's Metaphysics (en Inglés)
Price: 133.03 USD
Availability: InStock
Author: Jiyuan Yu
ISBN: 9789401039918

portada The Structure of Being in Aristotle's Metaphysics (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Editorial

Springer

Autor

Jiyuan Yu

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

238

Encuadernación

Tapa Blanda

Dimensiones

23.4 x 15.6 x 1.4 cm

Peso

0.38 kg.

ISBN13

9789401039918

Categorías

Catálogos de bibliografías
Filosofía antigua griega y romana
Metafísica y ontología

The Structure of Being in Aristotle's Metaphysics (en Inglés)

Jiyuan Yu (Autor) · Springer · Tapa Blanda

Libro Nuevo

$ 133.03

$ 266.06

Ahorras: $ 133.03

50% descuento

Envío normal

Origen: Estados Unidos (Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)

Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el Lunes 22 de Julio y el Miércoles 31 de Julio.

Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de Ecuador entre 1 y 3 días hábiles luego del envío.

Reseña del libro "The Structure of Being in Aristotle's Metaphysics (en Inglés)"

In his Metaphysics, Aristotle claims that he is seeking to establish a science of being. Being, at the most general level, is divided by Aristotle into the following four types: 1. Accidental being 2. Being as truth 3. Potential/actual being l 4. Per se being Per se (kath hauto) being can also be translated as "being in its own right" or "intrinsic being". This type of being has been referred to by Aristotle in different ways. The list of per se beings includes substance, quantity, quality, place, time, etc., and this is also the list ofcategories. At Meta. ix. l, 1045b28 Aristotle calls this list the "categories of being" (hai kategoriai tou ontos). At Meta. vi. 2, 1026a36 and ix. 1O, 1051a33-b2 per se being is called "being with reference to the figures ofpredication" (ta schemata tes kategorias, or "figures ofcategories, ). 2 Of these four types of being, accidental being is briefly treated in Meta. vi. 2-3 and there Aristotle claims that the study of accidental being can be dismissed on the grounds that accidental being is indeterminate and cannot be 3 the object ofknowledge. He also does not pay much attention to being as truth and treats it briefly in two short texts: Meta. viA and ix. 1O.