Name: Retirement Security: Comparison of Retirement Benefits for W. R. Grace & Company and Civil Service Employees: Ocg-84-1 (en Inglés)
Price: 31.63 USD
Availability: InStock
Author: U. S. Government Accountability Office ( ; U. S. Government Accountability Office (
ISBN: 9781289127756

portada Retirement Security: Comparison of Retirement Benefits for W. R. Grace & Company and Civil Service Employees: Ocg-84-1 (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Editorial

Bibliogov

Autor

U. S. Government Accountability Office ( ; U. S. Government Accountability Office (

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

Encuadernación

Tapa Blanda

Dimensiones

24.6 x 18.9 x 0.1 cm

Peso

0.07 kg.

ISBN13

9781289127756

Categorías

Política y gobierno

Retirement Security: Comparison of Retirement Benefits for W. R. Grace & Company and Civil Service Employees: Ocg-84-1 (en Inglés)

U. S. Government Accountability Office ( ; U. S. Government Accountability Office ( (Autor) · Bibliogov · Tapa Blanda

Libro Nuevo

$ 31.63

$ 48.67

Ahorras: $ 17.03

35% descuento

Envío normal

Origen: Estados Unidos (Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)

Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el Viernes 26 de Julio y el Martes 06 de Agosto.

Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de Ecuador entre 1 y 3 días hábiles luego del envío.

Reseña del libro "Retirement Security: Comparison of Retirement Benefits for W. R. Grace & Company and Civil Service Employees: Ocg-84-1 (en Inglés)"

In response to a congressional request, GAO compared the retirement benefits offered by W. R. Grace & Company with the benefits available from the Federal civil service retirement system (CSRS). GAO obtained information from the firm on the age, length of service, and retirement benefits for the firm's employees who retired in 1983 and similar data from the Office of Personnel Management for civil service retirees. In addition, GAO analyzed provisions of the firm's salaried employees' pension and savings plans as well as CSRS provisions. GAO found that the firm's retirement program offers potentially greater benefits than CSRS for most civil service employees while others could receive greater benefits from CSRS. However, GAO stated that these comparisons should not be the basis for reaching conclusions about the overall generosity of CSRS or private sector programs. GAO indicated that prior recommendations to CSRS were adopted with substantial savings to the Government but noted its continuing concern about CSRS costs and the appropriateness of some CSRS benefit provisions.