Name: Public Expenditure and Indian Development Policy 1960 70 (Cambridge South Asian Studies) (en Inglés)
Price: 40.37 USD
Availability: InStock
Author: John Toye; J. F. J. Toye
ISBN: 9780521050029

portada Public Expenditure and Indian Development Policy 1960 70 (Cambridge South Asian Studies) (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Editorial

Cambridge University Press

Autor

John Toye; J. F. J. Toye

Año

2007

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

292

Encuadernación

Tapa Blanda

ISBN

0521050022

ISBN13

9780521050029

N° edición

Categorías

Fiscalidad y hacienda pública

Public Expenditure and Indian Development Policy 1960 70 (Cambridge South Asian Studies) (en Inglés)

John Toye; J. F. J. Toye (Autor) · Cambridge University Press · Tapa Blanda

Libro Nuevo

$ 40.37

$ 80.75

Ahorras: $ 40.37

50% descuento

Envío normal

Origen: España (Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)

Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el Martes 23 de Julio y el Jueves 01 de Agosto.

Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de Ecuador entre 1 y 3 días hábiles luego del envío.

Reseña del libro "Public Expenditure and Indian Development Policy 1960 70 (Cambridge South Asian Studies) (en Inglés)"

Of the many different ways in which economists have tried to analyse public expenditure, the most relevant to Indian economic development is that which links the level of public expenditure with the rate at which the state can accumulate capital. The abstract theory of this link, however, must be complemented by a historical account of the degree to which a state accumulation policy was understood by Indian policy makers, and of the other (often inconsistent) elements in the economic strategy of Indian nationalism. After attempting to provide accounts both of the abstract theory and of the institutional and policy context within which it was applied, this book analyses original empirical data on public expenditure in India between 1960 and 1970. The real growth rate of public expenditure, its functional and economic composition at the all-India level are presented, and the strong contrast between the patterns of the first and last five year periods is elucidated. The effect of the 1965-67 droughts and bad harvests in producing this contrast is assessed.