Name: Australia's Human Rights Scrutiny Regime: Democratic Masterstroke or Mere Window Dressing? (en Inglés)
Price: 33.04 USD
Availability: InStock
Author: Fletcher, Adam
ISBN: 9780522874112

portada Australia's Human Rights Scrutiny Regime: Democratic Masterstroke or Mere Window Dressing? (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Autor

Adam Fletcher

Editorial

Mup Academic

Año

2018

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

437

Encuadernación

Tapa Blanda

Dimensiones

20.3 x 12.7 x 2.3 cm

Peso

0.43 kg.

ISBN13

9780522874112

Categorías

Islas del pacífico y del atlántico
Derechos humanos

Australia's Human Rights Scrutiny Regime: Democratic Masterstroke or Mere Window Dressing? (en Inglés)

Adam Fletcher (Autor) · Mup Academic · Tapa Blanda

Libro Físico

$ 33.04

$ 66.08

Ahorras: $ 33.04

50% descuento

Envío normal

Origen: Estados Unidos (Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)

Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el Martes 16 de Julio y el Lunes 29 de Julio.

Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de Ecuador entre 1 y 3 días hábiles luego del envío.

Reseña del libro "Australia's Human Rights Scrutiny Regime: Democratic Masterstroke or Mere Window Dressing? (en Inglés)"

In 2010 the Australian Government decided that it would not propose a Human Rights Act, despite the relevant recommendation of the 2008-09 National Human Rights Consultation. Instead, it introduced a Human Rights Framework comprising several measures to enhance human rights protection, including theHuman Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011. The scrutiny regime under that Act was designed to ensure rights would be given due consideration before Commonwealth legislation was passed. The Act created a unique 'bipartite dialogue' system, involving a formal interchange on rights compatibility between the executive and Parliament, while excluding the courts. This set the Commonwealth apart from jurisdictions such as the ACT, Victoria, New Zealand and the UK, which have statutory rights instruments administered by their courts. The book presents a detailed study of all aspects of the scrutiny regime, and compares the regime with its closest counterparts overseas. In assessing the regime's impact, it argues that a system in which the executive and Parliament are responsible both for protecting rights and for remedying rights breaches is neither more legitimate nor more effective than one involving all three branches of government. Accordingly, it calls for strengthening reforms.