Name: An Analysis of the Factors Affecting Training Transfer Within the Work Environment (en Inglés)
Price: 67.24 USD
Availability: InStock
Author: Williams, Daniel J.
ISBN: 9781288294572

portada An Analysis of the Factors Affecting Training Transfer Within the Work Environment (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Autor

Daniel J. Williams

Editorial

Biblioscholar

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

Encuadernación

Tapa Blanda

Dimensiones

24.6 x 18.9 x 0.5 cm

Peso

0.19 kg.

ISBN13

9781288294572

Categorías

Educación

An Analysis of the Factors Affecting Training Transfer Within the Work Environment (en Inglés)

Daniel J. Williams (Autor) · Biblioscholar · Tapa Blanda

Libro Nuevo

$ 67.24

$ 134.48

Ahorras: $ 67.24

50% descuento

Envío normal

Origen: Estados Unidos (Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)

Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el Lunes 22 de Julio y el Miércoles 31 de Julio.

Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de Ecuador entre 1 y 3 días hábiles luego del envío.

Reseña del libro "An Analysis of the Factors Affecting Training Transfer Within the Work Environment (en Inglés)"

A meta-analysis of 34 studies was performed to explore the magnitude in which work environment manipulates training transfer. The independent variables for this study included supervisor support, subordinate support, peer support, transfer climate, relapse prevention, goal setting, continuous learning culture, task constraints, and frequency of use. This study performed a moderator analysis to compare the effect these independent variables had on management and non-management training; and self-reporting versus supervisor or peer reporting; and training versus development. Results revealed that relapse prevention (.65) had the highest levels of correlation of all independent variables to training transfer. The results also showed that managerial training (.32) had higher levels of correlation to training transfer as compared to non-managerial training (.20). Self-reporting (.28) showed higher levels of training transfer than did supervisor or peer reporting (.16). Training (.30) showed higher levels of training transfer compared to development (.16). Finally, limitations and future research are discussed.