Name: A Civil Engineer's Perspective on How AEFs Can Be Reorganized and Trained to Meet Joint Requirements at Today's Bare Bases? (en Inglés)
Price: 87.79 USD
Availability: InStock
Author: McCallie, John K.
ISBN: 9781288308699

portada A Civil Engineer's Perspective on How AEFs Can Be Reorganized and Trained to Meet Joint Requirements at Today's Bare Bases? (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Autor

John K. McCallie

Editorial

Biblioscholar

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

Encuadernación

Tapa Blanda

Dimensiones

24.6 x 18.9 x 0.2 cm

Peso

0.09 kg.

ISBN13

9781288308699

Categorías

Educación

A Civil Engineer's Perspective on How AEFs Can Be Reorganized and Trained to Meet Joint Requirements at Today's Bare Bases? (en Inglés)

John K. McCallie (Autor) · Biblioscholar · Tapa Blanda

Libro Nuevo

$ 87.79

$ 135.07

Ahorras: $ 47.27

35% descuento

Envío normal

Origen: Estados Unidos (Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)

Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el Lunes 29 de Julio y el Miércoles 07 de Agosto.

Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de Ecuador entre 1 y 3 días hábiles luego del envío.

Reseña del libro "A Civil Engineer's Perspective on How AEFs Can Be Reorganized and Trained to Meet Joint Requirements at Today's Bare Bases? (en Inglés)"

This paper contends that the USAF learned valuable lessons from recent expeditionary campaigns such as Operation Desert Storm, Operation Iraqi Freedom, and Operation Enduring Freedom. The early days saw combat aircraft arriving at forward operating bases well in advance of their combat support. Information obtained from the Air Force Doctrine Center (AFDC) and secondary sources (e.g. RAND reports, Air University Library papers, and books) reveal the following arguments: 1) currently the USAF does not foster "jointness" between service branches; 2) airpower's inefficient beddown operations with joint forces necessitates newer concepts for the Air Expeditionary Force mission; 3) Air Expeditionary Forces have not solved the difficult lessons learned for improvement in equipment, command and control, and decision processes which exist still today and inhibit flexibility on the battlefield; and 4) airmen have successfully overcame challenges in the field but these Air Expeditionary Forces must become more agile to respond to contingencies in the future. Such arguments make it clear that the USAF must meet the demanding deployment schedules, while ensuring Air Expeditionary Forces are able to operate more effectively in joint and coalition environments.